Don't Market Kids' Rx Drugs to Parents
by Lawrence M. Hinman
Los Angeles Times, November 18, 2001
|
We all remember Bob Dole in the Viagra commercial and the
Zen exercising for Celebrex. We have gotten used to the idea that drug companies
will advertise their products directly to us, even when these are prescription
medications.
But until this fall, the major pharmaceutical houses had respected a long-standing
United Nations treaty prohibiting the direct advertisement to parents of powerful
and highly addictive drugs such as Ritalin for attention deficit/hyperactivity
disorder, or ADHD.
Now, the manufacturers of drugs other than Ritalin have broken the treaty and
are marketing directly to parents. The ads, picturing happy boys in idyllic
families, appear in back-to-school issues of magazines such as Good Housekeeping
and clearly are intended to encourage parents to ask their children's physicians
to prescribe the drugs. The drugs, although not substantially different from
Ritalin in content, contain a time-release mechanism so that one morning dose
can get a child through the day. In contrast, children on Ritalin typically
need to see the school nurse for a second dose. The Drug Enforcement Administration
recently added Ritalin to its list of "drugs of concern," a list that includes
cocaine, Ecstasy, marijuana, methamphetamine and other legal and illegal drugs.
Ritalin now has become one of the drugs most abused by adolescents.
With direct advertising to parents, drug companies are aiming at a vulnerable
group. Often confused and overwhelmed by their children's behavior, parents
may grasp at something that seems to come with medical legitimacy as well as
a promise of results.
Yet there are many reasons why parents may be overwhelmed by the activity level
of their children and there are many possible responses that do not involve
drugs.
Parents trying to cope with the multiple demands of everyday life and parenting
may see ADHD even when the real problem is less severe. Nor are drugs the only
or best way to respond to high levels of activity in children. Common sense
points out some of the initial steps--making sure the children are eating well
(low sugar and caffeine, high protein) and getting plenty of sleep and exercise.
These are effective treatments with no side effects. Structured programs of
behavior modification also can be effective. Turning too quickly and exclusively
to drugs promotes the belief that drugs offer a quick fix for our problems.
Also, it fails to look at the underlying environmental and social factors that
may encourage hyperactivity.
Furthermore, such drugs are most effective when monitored by skilled child and
adolescent psychiatrists. The drugs have different optimal levels for cognitive
and motor functioning. What may help Johnny think best may not slow him down
sufficiently to please his parents or teachers; what may slow Johnny down physically
also may turn him into a very dull boy.
Spurred on by these ads, parents will be asking family physicians and pediatricians
with much less training in the subtleties of the drugs to prescribe them.
The allure of drugs is that they offer seemingly simple answers to complex questions.
Direct advertisements muddy waters that are already difficult to navigate, solely
in the name of increased market share in a lucrative business. Such ads should
be banned by Food and Drug Administration regulations, not just international
treaties with no enforcement provisions.
Los Angeles Times, November 18, 2001
|